Online enquiry Symposium 2014

We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Page One

1. What was your overall impression of the Symposium 2014 (venue, contents, activities...)? *This question is required.

2. What did you particularly enjoy during that day (in the sessions or the plenary)? And why?

3. Please rate the following elements: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Excellent	Good	Not so good	Very poor
Speech of the Vorstand	Speech of the Vorstand: Excellent	Speech of the Vorstand: Good	Speech of the Vorstand: Not so good	Speech of the Vorstand: Very poor
Interview of the Vorstand and Thomas Ramge	Interview of the Vorstand and Thomas Ramge: Excellent	Interview of the Vorstand and Thomas Ramge: Good	Interview of the Vorstand and Thomas Ramge: Not so good	Interview of the Vorstand and Thomas Ramge: Very poor
Speech Daniel Hager	Speech Daniel Hager: Excellent	Speech Daniel Hager: Good	Speech Daniel Hager: Not so good	Speech Daniel Hager: Very poor
TED speech of Denis Mourlane	TED speech of Denis Mourlane: Excellent	TED speech of Denis Mourlane: Good	TED speech of Denis Mourlane: Not so good	TED speech of Denis Mourlane: Very poor
TED speech of Christoph Fellinger	TED speech of Christoph Fellinger: Excellent	TED speech of Christoph Fellinger: Good	TED speech of Christoph Fellinger: Not so good	TED speech of Christoph Fellinger: Very poor
TED speech of Erin Meyer	TED speech of Erin Meyer: Excellent	TED speech of Erin Meyer: Good	TED speech of Erin Meyer: Not so good	TED speech of Erin Meyer: Very poor
Conclusion of the sessions in the plenary	Conclusion of the sessions in the plenary: Excellent	Conclusion of the sessions in the plenary: Good	Conclusion of the sessions in the plenary: Not so good	Conclusion of the sessions in the plenary: Very poor
Animation of Thomas Ramge	Animation of Thomas Ramge: Excellent	Animation of Thomas Ramge: Good	Animation of Thomas Ramge: Not so good	Animation of Thomas Ramge: Very poor

4. In which Deep-dive session did you participate?

5. Please rate the Deep-dive session you participated in:

Space Cell	Excellent	Good	Not so good	Very poor
Overall impression	Overall impression: Excellent	Overall impression: Good	Overall impression: Not so good	Overall impression: Very poor
Performance of the speaker	Performance of the speaker: Excellent	Performance of the speaker: Good	Performance of the speaker: Not so good	Performance of the speaker: Very poor
Performance of the moderator / journalist	Performance of the moderator / journalist: Excellent	Performance of the moderator / journalist: Good	Performance of the moderator / journalist: Not so good	Performance of the moderator / journalist: Very poor
Content (more superficial or really concrete)	Content (more superficial or really concrete): Excellent	Content (more superficial or really concrete): Good	Content (more superficial or really concrete): Not so good	Content (more superficial or really concrete): Very poor
Relevance for Hager Group	Relevance for Hager Group: Excellent	Relevance for Hager Group: Good	Relevance for Hager Group: Not so good	Relevance for Hager Group: Very poor
Relevance for your daily work	Relevance for your daily work: Excellent	Relevance for your daily work: Good	Relevance for your daily work: Not so good	Relevance for your daily work: Very poor

6. For you, what are the 3 key messages of the Symposium 2014 that you will keep in mind? *This question is required.

7. Were any subjects or questions left unanswered? If so, which?

8. Please grade the following elements:

Space Cell	Excellent	Good	Not so good	Very poor
Overall organisation	Overall organisation: Excellent	Overall organisation: Good	Overall organisation: Not so good	Overall organisation: Very poor
Information / communication before the event	Information / communication before the event: Excellent	Information / communication before the event: Good	Information / communication before the event: Not so good	Information / communication before the event: Very poor
Location	Location: Excellent	Location: Good	Location: Not so good	Location: Very poor
Transfer	Transfer: Excellent	Transfer: Good	Transfer: Not so good	Transfer: Very poor
Hotel	Hotel: Excellent	Hotel: Good	Hotel: Not so good	Hotel: Very poor
Meals for lunch and breaks	Meals for lunch and breaks: Excellent	Meals for lunch and breaks: Good	Meals for lunch and breaks: Not so good	Meals for lunch and breaks: Very poor
Dinner	Dinner: Excellent	Dinner: Good	Dinner: Not so good	Dinner: Very poor
Magicians	Magicians: Excellent	Magicians: Good	Magicians: Not so good	Magicians: Very poor

9. Did the Symposium live up to your expectations? Please select the most appropriate answer below: *This question is required.

Please enter an 'other' value for this selection.

10. What do you think could be improved ?

11. Any additional comments?