Skip survey header

Advanced Professional Impact Project (PIP)

Professional Impact Project

Successful graduate program candidates create a relevant Professional Impact Project for Advanced Programs that includes the following Practice aspects of the Advanced Competencies

  • Evidence-Based Decision Making
  • Technology Use
  • Diversity
  • Professional Identity Development

Through this Professional Impact Project process, graduate candidates provide credible evidence of their ability to facilitate impact on constituent(s) and reflect upon their practice.

Please provide the rubric scores for Phases I, II, III, IV and V below.  (See rubric)

Candidate
This question requires a valid email address.
New Multiple Choice
Evaluator
This question requires a valid email address.

PHASE I: The candidate reviews relevant literature, contextual factors, and views of constituent(s) to define an area targeted for growth

DEFINE AREA TARGETED FOR GROWTH

(1 -Unacceptable, 2 -Acceptable, 3 -Target)
Space Cell Rubric Score
What has caused the candidate to focus on this particular area targeted for growth?
What professional literature informs the area targeted for growth?
What data sources support that this is an area targeted for growth in the proposed setting?
Does the candidate consider input from constituent(s) when defining the area targeted for growth?
Based on the professional literature, the proposed setting, and constituent input, what does the candidate hope to learn as a result of doing this Professional Impact Project?

PHASE II: The candidate uses information from the contextual factors, literature, and data that impact constituent(s) to set goals, design an action plan, and assess impact.

PLAN OF ACTION

(1 -Unacceptable, 2 -Acceptable, 3 -Target)
Space Cell Rubric Score
What is the action plan?
What factors were used to select or design the action?
Does the action plan demonstrate understanding of the area targeted for growth?
Does the action plan include valid and reliable measures to assess the impact of the action?
Does the proposed action demonstrate consideration of constituent(s)' needs/viewpoints?

PHASE III: The candidate implements an action plan aligned with specific goals and constituent characteristics and needs and with strong consideration of contextual factors.

IMPLEMENTATION

(1 -Unacceptable, 3 -Acceptable, 3 -Target)

*This question is required.
Space Cell Rubric Score
What is the nature of the alignment/fidelity of actions with the action plan?
Is the action plan implemented with respect to constituent(s)' needs/viewpoints?
Are adequate data collected and presented in a systematic way?
Is data analysis appropriate to address the questions asked or area targeted for growth investigated?
Is data analysis thorough and accurate?