Skip survey header

2011 HCV Council

Page One


Grade your level of support for the following statements using the scale below:

1 - Accept completely
2 - Accept with some reservations
3 - Accept with major reservations
4 - Reject with reservations
5 - Reject completely

4. Statement 1: IL28B genotyping should be performed in all candidates for PI/PEG-IFN/RBV therapy.
5. Statement 2: PI/PEG-IFN/RBV is the standard of care in all HCV genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients.
6. Statement 3: PI/PEG-IFN/RBV is the standard of care in all HCV genotype 1 treatment-experienced patients.
7. Statement 4: Response-guided therapy should be utilized in all treatment-naïve patients treated with PI/PEG-IFN/RBV regimens.
8. Statement 5: Response-guided therapy should be utilized in all treatment-experienced patients treated with PI/PEG-IFN/RBV regimens.
9. Statement 6: Null responders to previous PEG-IFN/RBV with minimal liver disease should not be treated with PI-based therapy.
10. Statement 7: Viral resistance testing has no clinical utility in the management of HCV patients receiving PI/PEG-IFN/RBV therapy.
11. Statement 8: Response to lead-in therapy should not influence the decision to initiate a PI-based regimen.
12. Statement 9: Patients treated with a telaprevir-based regimen who develop a severe rash should be switched to a boceprevir-based regimen.
13. Statement 10: In PI-based HCV treatment regimens, erythropoietin should be used to manage anemia prior to RBV dose reduction.
14. Statement 11: PI/PEG-IFN/RBV combinations are first line therapy in patients with HCV–HIV co-infection.
15. Statement 12: PI/PEG-IFN/RBV combinations are first line therapy in patients with HCV–transplant populations.

16. Are you interested in receiving the findings of the expert panel meeting from the HCV Council 2011; the outcomes of this field evaluation; and information on similar topics? *This question is required.
Survey Software powered by SurveyGizmo
Survey Software